Home
About Quanterion
Products/Services
 Services
 Training REPERTOIRE
 Software QuART PRO
 Publications
Doing Business with
   Quanterion

Quanterion Experience
Employment Opportunities

QuART
FREE Information
Downloads
 "RL Reliability Toolkit"
 Index to "Reliability Toolkit:
      Commercial Practices
      Edition"

 "Quanterion Automated
      Reliability Toolkit (QuART)"

 Military Stds and Hdbks
Other information  "Lunchtime Learning" Training
 "Reliability Ques"
 R&M Related Links
 Recommended Reading

Repairable Systems

Bathtub Curve ] Reliability Model Purpose ] Exponential Distribution ] [ Repairable Systems ]
Non-Repairable Systems ] Non-Repairable Calculation ]


What is a typical approach to modeling the reliability of a repairable system?

As an example, Figure 1 presents a simple reliability block diagram of a system and Table 1 summarizes a hypothetical assembly level set of failure rate data.  Failure rates for the individual “boxes” of the model can be derived from field failure rate data on exact or similar hardware.  If actual field data is unavailable from fielded systems, failure rates can be developed from published values for electronic components in handbooks such as Reliability Analysis Center (RAC) data books, RAC PRISM software, Bellcore, or MIL-HDBK-217 (Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment). These component level failure rates are summed to estimate expected “box” level failure rates.  

It should be noted that a limitation of using published data is that it becomes outdated quickly as technological advancements are made to improve component designs and manufacturing processes.  Never the less, published data from handbooks such as MIL-HDBK-217 are periodically updated and provide a starting point for system analysis when no other data sources exist.  

For this discussion, it should be noted that these failure rates are assumed to represent randomly occurring failures in the useful life portion of the bathtub curve.  Adjustments shown in Table 1 are to account for the application environment (i.e., aircraft versus ground).  Other adjustments can be made to account for different conditions, such as duty cycle, temperature and part screening.  common adjustment factors for a component’s electrical, thermal and mechanical stresses exist in MIL-HDBK-217.  Thus for this example, the series failure rate, which is simply every “box” in series (all must work) is 259 failures per million hours (FPMH).  Taking the reciprocal of this results in a mean-time-between-failure (MTBF) of 3861 hours.   The modeling of redundant configurations will be discussed elsewhere in these FAQ.

 

 

Figure 1 - Hypothetical Personal Computer System Model

 

Unit

Qty

Failure 

Rate (FPMH)

Data Source

Data Source Environment

Environmental Adjustment Factor

Total Failure Rate (FPMH)

3.5" Disk Drives

3

40

Field 

Office

1

120

CD-ROM Drive

2

40

Handbook

Office

1

 80

Hard Drive

1

35

Vendor Test

Office

1

 35

CPU Board

1

 1

Field

Aircraft

 .25

  1

Keyboard

1

10

Field

Office

1

 10

Monitor

1

40

Field

Aircraft

 .25

 10

Modem

1

 3

Handbook

Office

1

  3

Total (Failures Per Million Hours) 

 

 

 

 

 

259

Table 1 - Summary of Failure Rates (FPMH = Failures per Million Hours)

 


Questions/Comments
:
qinfo@quanterion.com




811 Court Street
Utica NY 13502-4096
Phone: 315.732.0097
Toll free: 877.808.0097
FAX: 315.732.3261


Copyright (c) 2004 Quanterion Solutions Incorporated